Case study · Workforce and financial services

Closing the AI-to-production gap: 70% faster development, quality intact.

A Fortune 500 workforce solutions provider that processes millions of benefit claims a year needed to deliver faster without weakening compliance or security.

Pilot results
Engineering team planning a governed release
70%Shorter cycle time for complex features
Engineer reviewing automated test results
8×Faster test case creation
Developers reviewing code together
86%Automated test coverage, up from about 45%
Cloud engineer in a data center aisle
4×Faster infrastructure provisioning

All results come from a controlled pilot, not a full production rollout.

The challenge

AI wrote code faster. Delivery did not speed up.

AI coding tools were producing code faster, but end-to-end delivery time stayed flat because testing, security checks and deployment could not keep up.

  • QA overload. Test creation fell far behind AI-generated code.
  • Security delays. Periodic manual scans could not match commit frequency.
  • Deployment friction. Release gates were built for a slower pace.
  • Compliance demands. Every change needed an audit trail and documented approval.
  • Low error tolerance. Incorrect benefit calculations carry regulatory and reputational risk.
Approach

A four-step governed pilot.

  1. 01

    Find failure points

    Map where workflows would break under AI-accelerated volume, starting with QA, security scanning and provisioning.

  2. 02

    Design governance

    Build controls mapped to the client's specific regulatory obligations.

  3. 03

    Embed in real work

    Put AI tools into live IDE, CI/CD and provisioning processes, not sandboxes.

  4. 04

    Validate and scale

    Produce measurable, repeatable results that support a wider rollout.

Scope

Four areas, governed end to end.

AI coding assistants

Standard prompting patterns and code conventions, with human review of architecture and complex logic.

AI-assisted testing

Playwright test generation and coverage-gap analysis, scaled to code output.

Automated security scanning

Continuous scanning in CI/CD with compliance-aligned rules and automatic audit trails.

Infrastructure as code

AI-generated IaC with governance guardrails and human approval at release points.

Before and after

By the numbers: traditional vs governed AI.

AreaTraditionalAI-assisted, governed
Complex feature development~10 days~3 days
Infrastructure provisioning~4 hours~1 hour
Test case creation~2 days~2 hours
Automated test coverage~40–50%~86%
Security and quality controlsManual and periodicBuilt into CI/CD, no regressions observed
Ready when you are

Close your own AI-to-production gap.

Tell us where delivery slows down. We'll show how governed AI fits your controls.